The new Wilson Combat EDC X9 is an alloy-framed compact double stack 9mm that’s based on the 1911. But when you deviate from the original 1911 frame material, barrel length, and caliber, and then completely redesign the grip dimensions and remove the grip safety, what you end up with is not simply another 1911. It’s more like what would happen if you gave John Moses Browning some 21st century manufacturing equipment and asked him to build a Glock 19.

You can watch the full review video below, or scroll down for the blogified version of the transcript.

Is it any good?

Even though I like 1911s, it’s been quite a while since I spent any serious time shooting one. So, I think the EDC X9 is pretty good, but that probably doesn’t mean a whole lot coming from me. Fortunately, you don’t have to take my word for it. I was able to try out the EDC X9 a few weeks ago when I met up with John Johnston for a day at the range. John is the host of Ballistic Radio and Wilson Combat happens to be one of his sponsors. John has been evaluating a pre-production sample of this pistol for the last few months and had some insights to share:

“As far as performance goes, the main thing I’m seeing out of the EDC X9 is that I am able to shoot it as if it were a much larger gun. By getting rid of the grip safety, what it allows you to do is get higher on the gun so that you can shoot it better. It’s more controllable and it’s, in general, more pleasant to work with, especially at speed.

John Johnston and the EDC X9
John Johnston of Ballistic Radio firing the EDC X9

“If you’re looking for a gun that fits inside of this package, you’re looking at stuff like a Glock 19 or a Sig P320 or somewhere in that range. The Wilson EDC X9 fits into that G19 size package and performs better, period. And to get a G19 or a 320 that works as well as this does, you have to work on it. You will start adding parts like a match-grade barrel that’s professionally fit to get the inch and a half at 25-yard accuracy guarantee that this thing comes with. To get the recoil characteristics, you’re starting to add comps. To get the grip ergonomics you’re stippling the gun and you’re recontouring it and reprofiling it. That starts to cost money. You see people running around with 2 and 3 thousand dollar Glocks and this comes with all the function of those right out of the box.”

For what it’s worth, I tend to agree with John on those points. The recoil is much milder than you expect with a gun of this size and weight and when you combine that with a light and crisp 1911-style trigger, it’s easy to run this gun faster than other compact 9mms.

How big is it?

The comparison to the Glock 19 is no exaggeration. It’s tough to appreciate just how compact the EDC X9 is until you handle it in person. Fully loaded with 16 rounds, it’s only 5 ounces heavier than the Glock, and roughly the same size in all dimensions. Compared to a 9mm lightweight Commander 1911, the EDC X9 is smaller, and still has 6 more rounds of ammo on board, and far superior ergonomics.

Compact 9mm Pistol Size Comparison
Model Wilson Combat EDC X9 Glock 19 Sig Sauer P320C Colt LW Commander
capacity 15+1 15+1 15+1 9+1
weight unloaded 29.09 oz 23.7 oz 25.8 oz 29.4 oz
weight loaded 35.04 oz 30.18 oz 32.68 oz 36 oz
barrel length 4″ 4.01″ 3.9″ 4.25″
overall length 7.4″ 7.36″ 7.2″ 7.75″
height 5.25″ 4.99″ 5.3″ 5.5″
width 1.4″ 1.18″ 1.4″ 1.25″

John believes the EDC X9 is reminiscent of another famous John Browning design. “The grip reminds me a lot of a Browning Hi-Power grip. It’s very ergonomic, it fits really well in the hand. It’s got the best parts of the 1911 as far as the sliding trigger, a really well designed manual safety inside of a very small package as far as a grip that’s really easy to conceal. It’s kind of like a Hi-Power that’s had the stuff that makes Hi-Powers not fun taken off of it.”

Because of the double stack magazine, the grip has to be wider than the original 1911 design, but only slightly, thanks to the slim screwless grip panels. The grip is also shorter from front to back because it’s designed around the 9mm, which is a shorter cartridge than the 45. So even with a 15-round magazine, the overall grip circumference of the XDC X9 is actually smaller than the 1911’s. That means the trigger reach is a little shorter and the pistol will probably fit better in the average person’s hand.

The slide and the portion of the frame that’s forward of the grip are close enough in size and shape to 4 and 4.25-inch 1911 pistols that most holsters designed for those guns will fit the EDC X9. The new pistol also shares parts compatibility with several traditional 1911 parts, including wear parts that must be periodically replaced like the recoil spring.

EDC X9 grip
The EDC X9 has no grip safety, and the slim screwless grip panels are held in place by the interchangeable backstrap.

Is it reliable?

Keeping in mind this is only a sample size of one, the EDC X9 John has been testing has been problem-free. “Once we’re done today, I’ll have about 3000 rounds through it. So far, it has been extremely reliable. Actually, it’s been reliable with ammo that won’t work in other guns — like Glocks that I have — where the round is loaded weird or it’s too light of a load, this thing will feed fine. But it also works really well with standard carry loads like 124 grain +P Gold Dot or Federal HST. It’s been reliable with a wide spectrum of bullet weights, velocities, and profiles. I’ve been really impressed so far.”

As of this week, John says he’s got about 4500 rounds through the gun, still with no malfunctions to speak of. Traditional 9mm 1911s have a reputation for being picky and high maintenance, but Wilson seems to have eliminated a lot of those issues by designing the EDC X9 from the ground up to reliably feed the 9mm cartridge.

Is it accurate?

Like John mentioned earlier, the EDC X9 comes with a 1.5-inch accuracy guarantee at 25 yards. That’s using a Ransom machine rest, but we wanted to see what we could do with a normal bench rest and some sandbags. We fired a few 5-round groups that were about 2.5 inches, but three of the five rounds would be within an inch or an inch and a half. That usually means the two fliers are human error, so I have no doubt the gun is capable of shooting 1.5-inch groups.

Wilson Combat EDC X9

From a more practical standpoint, having a good 1911-style single-action trigger certainly helps when you need to take a shot at longer distance. The front sight is a little wider than either John or I prefer, and I think that makes it tough to get a clean sight picture on smaller targets, but that really comes down to personal preference. It’s not any wider than the stock front sight on most compact handguns.

The pistol we used was equipped with a red fiber optic front sight and an adjustable u-notch “Tactical Battlesight” rear sight. Every EDC X9 is made to order, so if you don’t prefer those sights, you can get a green fiber optic, or you can choose a tritium or gold bead sight. Wilson also gives you the option to choose from two different size backstraps, three different trigger lengths, a variety of finish options, and you can get it with or without an ambidextrous safety or a light rail.

How much does it cost?

The base price is $2895, but some of the previously mentioned sight options add a couple of dollars to the cost.

Why do I need a $2900 pistol?

To be completely honest, I kind of hate this question. But it always comes up any time we talk about a gun with a four-digit price tag. So… I’m just gonna let John answer this time.

“Why does somebody need a $2900 pistol? You don’t. Period. You really don’t need much more than a… Ruger P89. That’ll work fine most of the time. It launches the same bullets. If we were only going on need, we’d all be driving around in Kias. $10,000 Kias that are not fun to drive, are not comfortable to drive, but they get us from point A to point B. So when people start talking about, ‘Well I could buy five Glocks for the cost of this.’ Well, yeah, the guy who buys the Corvette could buy seven Kias. He’s not going to drive the other six at the same time and it’s not going to perform the same way the Corvette does. So if it makes you happy and you can afford it, then do it. If you can’t afford it, or it doesn’t make you happy, then don’t do it. It’s really that easy.”

For more details on the EDC X9, head over to Wilson Combat’s site.

Leave a Comment Below

12 thoughts on “Review: Wilson Combat EDC X9

  1. Wilson Combat is trying to go Salient. They need to focus on what makes the 1911 great… and maximize that. This looks so busy that it its surprising there are no Punisher Skulls on it. Come on, WC. I know 1911 sales are slumped, but you are going about it the wrong way. Instead of making a 1911 look “Street”, how about you make a Street 1911 along the lines of Rock Island Armory… a Budget 1911 with solid good parts and an inexpensive finish and simple grips. THAT would sell. Having sold RIA’s hands over fists… I promise that would work.

    1. Uhh… there’s currently a 9+ month wait to get an EDC X9. I don’t think they’re having any problem selling them. Their customer base is not exactly the same as RIA’s.

    2. If 1911 sales will go further down in the future. IMO, Wilson is smart to build this model. Perhaps they’ll come out with an even smaller .380 version.

      Interesting idea about Wilson making a budget 1911 with the price being low relative to their other models. I don’t know if it would eat into sales of their more expensive models, or if it would make Wilson look less elite.

      I owned a RIA. It wasn’t good, though customer service was tops.

  2. Thanks for treating your readers like morons. The main information on the performance and value of this weapon comes from the author’s abundant citations of John Johnston, a Wilson Combat sponsored shooter and media personality, and yet this piece is called a ‘review’. Please. And I have had an EDC X9 on order for some time.

    1. I’m sorry you feel that way. Wilson pays for air time on John’s radio show… he’s not obligated to like or promote their products outside of that context (in fact, in the past, John has been openly critical of products from show sponsors that did not perform as expected). John is a friend, a very skilled shooter, and knows the 1911 platform much better than I do. His opinion on this gun is far more valuable than my own since my past experience with 1911s is fairly limited. John liked the demo gun enough to order one of his own, and I’d say that’s a pretty solid endorsement, regardless of any sponsorship deal.

      1. I will stipulate to every point you make about Mr. Johnston’s relationship to his sponsor(s) and call out this article as unethical journalistically for posing as a review because it’s primary source is an expert who receives compensation from the product manufacturer disclosed or not. Pretty simple, that is a glaring conflict of interest that the author and LG chose to ignore.

        1. I guess the best option for you then, after having been supposedly “treated like a moron” is to stop the order on the X9 pistol and let it go to someone who wasn’t so offended and go purchase a Glock 19. He ran 4,500 rounds through the brand piece without a single stoppage while maintaining accuracy, I don’t care who does the review, if it hadn’t performed, I highly doubt it would have received such praise from him, nor the other countless reviews that have come to the same conclusion as his. He did critique the sight width, which was not to his liking and also mentioned the price as not being for everybody. Maybe that’s you.

  3. I just purchased a Dan Wesson Specialist Commander in 9mm and just love it. As a retired senior prototype machinist, having worked 40 years on the Shuttle, the Hubble, and most recently the James Webb I have a great appreciation for form, fit and function. It’s that aspect of the Wilson EDC X9 that enticed me to put down $500 and wait 6 months to part with $2500 more in order to own one of these pups. Your review of this handgun, while a solid endorsement (with no apologies, thank you), provided me with a clear display of the logic of purchase and the advantages in operation of the WC edc x9.

  4. Holster Question… I noticed John was drawing from AIWB. What holster was he using? The X9 doesn’t fit my AIWB Keeper’s holster for a 4-inch 1911.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *